The 1950s is known as The Golden Age of Television because in those early days of the medium, the programming veered more toward high culture, with stage dramas and orchestra performances coming through the airwaves along with vaudeville-type shows and the earliest sitcoms and dramas.
It was in this era that a group of Boston nuns decided that television might be just the medium for them. In its Aug. 19, 1955 issue LIFE wrote about how these nuns were learning the new technology, hoping it would be a tool for education:
Twenty lively nuns overran a studio full of cameras, lights, microphones and monitors last week and became wise in the worldly ways of television. Parochial school teachers, they were learning the technical tricks of the TV trade from working professionals and expecting that they will regularly receive and produce educational telecasts for their schools. On WIHS-TV, set up by the Boston archdiocese as a closed circuit, they worked in front of and behind the cameras, staged commercials they wrote, tossed cues, directed skits, and combined all their talents in a convent-cast version of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.
LIFE photographer Grey Villet was there to capture the spectacle, and it makes for some delightful pictures. Not too long ago a professor at UC-Davis wrote a serious academic paper on the topic of why nuns are so funny. But Villet’s pictures, especially the ones of the nuns are acting out a Snow White skit, capture perfectly the memorable juxtapositions than can result when these holy women immerse themselves in the modern world.
The nuns’ ambitious for their productions were obviously narrow, with their focus on teaching. But the scenes of the nuns in front of the camera call to mind that the most most famous nun ever on television was The Flying Nun, a sitcom starring Sally Field that ran from 1967 to 1970, when the Golden Age of Television had given way to a world of popular entertainment..
A group of nuns learning how to make television programming at a Boston TV station, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Nuns learned about making educational programming at a Boston TV station, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Three nuns in praying position while in front of the TV cameras on a TV set where they were making educational television, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A nun acted out a makeshift TV commercial, featuring a joke about the pocket size of nuns’ habits, during a workshop at a Boston TV studio, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A group of nuns learning how to make television programming at a Boston TV station, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A group of nuns learning how to make television programming at a Boston TV station, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A group of nuns learning how to make television programming at a Boston TV station, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Nuns learned about making educational programming at a Boston television station, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A TV workshop for nuns including filming a skit based on Snow White, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A TV workshop for nuns including filming a skit based on Snow White, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A TV workshop for nuns including filming a skit based on Snow White, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A TV workshop for nuns including filming a skit based on Snow White, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A TV workshop for nuns including filming a skit based on Snow White, 1955.
Grey Villet/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
View of five nuns, each with a paper makes that depicts one of the Seven Dwarfs, as they perform under a boom microphone, August 13, 1955
One of the great changes that took place during the original run of LIFE magazine was the rise of television culture. When the magazine was founded in 1936, television still largely a creature of the laboratory. By the time the magazine ended its original run in 1972, about 95 percent of American homes had a television.
The April 11, 1949 issue of LIFE captured the distinctive color of local television as it first came to the Lone Star state, in a story titled Television, Texas Style. Here’s a few lines from the report that capture the flavor of what was going on at Fort Worth station WPAB, a pioneering broadcaster in Texas.
When television hit Texas last fall, set owners within reach of the Southwest’s biggest station, WBAP-TV at Fort Worth, expected something that would really spell out the Texas spirit. They got it. Outside the studio the station’s well-heeled owners, Carter Publications Inc., picked up every rodeo, stock show and cutting-horse contest within range. Inside the studio they ran chuck wagons, cow ponies, autos and an occasional elephant from a visiting circus past the cameras and regularly put on big barn dances with as many as 120 people prancing about on the huge 82-foot-long floor…..The station director frequently runs a herd of cattle right through the studio. This sometimes allows pleased Texans to watch an alert stock handler bulldog an errant calf just before it demolishes a camera or gets badly tangled up in the studio’s steel scaffolding. (It never lets them see the arrival of many “cow hands” in well-polished Cadillacs.)
The photographs by Thomas McAvoy capture the scene in loving detail, from the cattle and horses in the studio to the cowboy boots of the cameraman and the memorable mugging of comedian Bruce Pierce. Also of note is the studio audience: the men and women are dressed formally. If you had to guess just from looking at them, you might think they were attending a wedding rather than a staged hoedown.
Another Texas-sized aspect of the production was its broadcast reach: “Although most eastern stations are happy with extreme ranges of 80 to 100 miles, WBAP-TV engineers claim that because of flat terrain they can supply Texas television fare to set owners in Hattiesburg, Miss., 490 air miles away.”
Of course broadcast range is now an obsolete concept, in an age where shows are transmitted digitally for viewing around the globe to anyone with an internet connection. But if the old stations had limited reach, they were also stepping into a new medium full of possibilities, and this Fort Worth station was certainly having fun with them.
A taping of local programming at a Fort Worth television station, 1949.
Thomas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Cattle were regularly herded through a studio during tapings at a Fort Worth television station, 1949.
homas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The horse and buggy added to the Texas atmosphere during television tapings at a Fort Worth station, 1949.
Thomas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A taping at a Fort Worth television station, 1949.
Thomas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Cowboy comedian Bruce Pierce performing on a Fort Worth TV program, 1949.
Thomas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Comedian Bruce Pierce at the taping of a Fort Worth television show, 1949.
Thomas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The filming of the Fort Worth television show “Barn Dance,” which recruited performers from local square dance clubs, 1949.
Thomas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A taping of the local television show “Barn Dance” at a Fort Worth television studio, 1949.
Thomas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The taping of the local show Barn Dance at a Fort Worth television studio, 1949.
Thomas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A taping of the television show Barn Dance at a studio in Fort Worth, 1949.
Thomas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The studio audience during a taping at a Fort Worth television station, 1949.
Thomas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A cameraman wore cowboy boots while filming for a Fort Worth TV station, 1949.
homas D. McAvoy/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
In 2023 Barbie enjoyed her biggest year since her creation in 1959, when Greta Gerwig’s hit movie found new resonance in the classic children’s toy.
In 1986 Barbie was the subject of work by another artist, Andy Warhol. It might seem that the doll was a natural subject for an artist who had famously painted Marilyn Monroe and also had interest in consumer culture and mass production. But Warhol actually came to Barbie in a strange and roundabout way.
As recounted in this BBC story, Warhol was at first interested in painting Billy Boy, a figure in the world of art and fashion. Billy Boy, however, did not want to be painted. But Billy Boy was a big Barbie fan. He had a collection of more than 11,000 Barbie dolls (with 3,000-plus Ken dolls as well) and authored a book titled Barbie: Her LIfe and Times.
After turning down Warhol’s repeated requests, he reportedly told the artist, as a blow-off, that he should paint a Barbie doll instead:
“Out of annoyance I said to him, ‘Well if you really want to do my portrait, do a portrait of Barbie because Barbie, c’est moi.
“He took it literally. He took a Barbie that I had given him and turned it into a portrait and called it ‘Portrait of Billy Boy’.”
The painting would end up being Warhol’s last, as he died on Feb. 22, 1987. There actually ended up being two versions of his Barbie portrait: The original version sold at auction for $1.1 million in 2014. A second version was created for and purchased by Mattel, the company that gave us Barbie. The bonds between the worlds deepened when Mattel introduced a limited edition doll of Barbie done up as Andy Warhol.
Andy Warhol displayed his portrait of Barbie, 1986.
There’s something about mummies. Those preserved human remains are powerful on several contradictory levels, sometimes simultaneously: They’re seductive, with an aura of mystery and rich antiquarian appeal; at the same time, mummies can be repellent because, well, they’re preserved human remains; and certainly they have the capacity to terrify as eerie avatars of mortality that have inspired a whole subgenre of horror fiction and film. Mummies are time capsules bearing secrets of the distant past and often stand as works of art; think of Egyptian sarcophaguses, with their elaborately carved and painted ornamentation. On a more modest scale, the 7,000-year-old mummies of South America, crafted by an early maritime community known as the Chinchorros, resemble small statues, hardly as grand as the Egyptians’ handiwork but with a kind of rugged and deeply affecting beauty.
Indeed, mummies come in different forms from a variety of regions and historical eras. Of course, it’s important to distinguish between naturally mummified remains, like those found buried in the bogs of Denmark and Britain, where peat released acids that essentially pickled the body, and human-made mummies, meticulously prepared, typically—but not exclusively—by removing internal organs and then drying and treating the corpse. In addition to the Chinchorros, mummification was practiced by the Incas as well as the ancient Chinese and Canary Islanders, among others. But mummies are most inextricably associated with Egypt in the age of the pharaohs, where bodies were embalmed and preserved, bound in their signature linen bandages, specifically to prepare them for the next world. If they were prominent enough, they were buried with valuable possessions to take along on their journey. Either way, Egyptian mummies and artifacts are routinely among the most popular attractions at some of the world’s great museums. The 1922 discovery of the “boy king” Tutankhamun—whose tomb was filled with a spectacular array of treasures—famously ignited a global frenzy.
“I think people are obsessed and interested in mummies because they are such immediately recognizable people—so they don’t look like remains but rather like someone who might get up and start talking at any moment,” says Salima Ikram, Distinguished University Professor of Egyptology at the American University in Cairo and a noted historian of Egyptian funerary practices. “For example, look at the mummy of Ramses II or King Seti I. They really look like who they were, and this is what fascinates, because it telescopes time as one looks at people who lived 3,000 or 4,000 years ago—the fact that their faces are recognizable in many instances makes it all the more poignant and intimate. I think it gives an immediacy and intimacy with the past.”
Ikram also acknowledges that mummies have a darker, even frightening allure. “Of course, they’re not all beautiful or have faces that are explicitly preserved, and that brings in some of the thrill of the macabre,” she says. “The reason that people will go and watch a horror film is the same reason that some of those people will be enthralled by mummies. And death is also something that fascinates everyone because it comes to us all.”
The history of mummies is also about the study and treatment of mummies—and not always by respectful scholars like Ikram. In past centuries, mummy tombs commonly fell prey to plunder and desecration. From medieval times through the Renaissance, mummies were ground up and dispensed as medicine for their imagined healing properties; later, they were brought back to Europe and America as souvenirs for the wealthy or to be displayed in museums. In the 18th and 19th centuries, mummies served as popular entertainment at public “unwrappings” performed for paying audiences. There was often an undercurrent of racism and colonialism to it all—look how these strange, dark-skinned old exotics dealt with their dead.
On the other hand, mummies have also inspired a vast canon of serious archaeological and scientific study. The remains have offered a wealth of information about life in their ancient communities, more than ever now that researchers have the benefit of imaging technology. We know, for example, that the Egyptians were subject to some of the same illnesses that have plagued modern societies—heart disease, arthritis, smallpox, and polio, among others. In early 2023, a study published in the journal Frontiers in Medicine described CT scans conducted on the 2,300-year-old mummy of a teenage boy that had been discovered in 1916 and stored in the basement of the Egyptian Museum in Cairo ever since. Dubbed the Golden Boy mummy because of his gold mask and amulets, he was “digitally unwrapped” to reveal important cultural details without violating the integrity of the body. Scans showed that the boy’s 49 amulets came in 21 shapes and sizes, each with a special significance—and all meant to prepare him for the next world. Hence, a golden tongue amulet placed inside his mouth ensured that he could speak. A right-angle amulet was designed to keep him balanced and leveled.
To be sure, the idea that there is some kind of postmortem existence was central to human-generated mummification. In Egypt and elsewhere, preserving the integrity of the body was essential if the deceased were to transition smoothly to the afterlife. Mummies underscore the cruelest subtext of human experience, our awareness that death is inevitable and, despite all efforts to prevent it, unavoidable. One’s earthly life might be riddled with emotional and physical misery, comfortable and richly fulfilling, or somewhere in between. One might live to a great age or die achingly young. Either way, it’s all finite. Whether you have been blessed and would like more of a good thing, have been cursed and feel cheated, or simply want to enjoy more sunsets, it’s reasonable to ask, like Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller’s musical buzzkill, “Is that all there is?”
Long before recorded history, humans began trying to answer that question with a resounding “no” by cultivating a belief in some sort of afterlife. In ancient times, life expectancy was much shorter than today, sometimes brutally so. Chinchorros, for instance, were lucky to see 30 and suffered devastating rates of child mortality—which is why some of their most powerfully moving mummies are of doll-like infants and toddlers. Some Egyptians, including Pharaoh Ramses II, who died at around 90, lived well into old age. But for most ancients, except the lucky and privileged few, life was hard (and short) and then you died. There had to be something else—otherwise, what was the point? Of course, loss, bereavement, and the certainty of death are just as excruciatingly present today, no matter how long we or our loved ones may last. Mummies represent that universal aspect of being human. “Grief, pain, sorrow, joy, and love are all primordial emotions that connect us with the past,” says the Chilean anthropologist Bernardo Arriaza, who has spent decades studying Chinchorro culture. “We are all united by them.”
And so, when we gaze on mummies, whether we find them endlessly intriguing or unnervingly creepy, we should see a bit of ourselves.
The mummy of Ramses II (1301-1235 BC), son of Sethy I, at Cairo Museum, Egypt, in April 2006.
Photo by Patrick Landmann/Getty Images
Egypt’s antiquities chief Zahi Hawass (center) supervised the removal of the linen-wrapped mummy of King Tutankhamun from his stone sarcophagus in his underground tomb in the famed Valley of the Kings in Luxor, Nov. 4, 2007. The pharaoh’s mummy was moved from its ornate sarcophagus in the tomb where its 1922 discovery caused an international sensation to a nearby climate-controlled case where experts say it will be better preserved.
BEN CURTIS/AFP via Getty Images
Jens Klocke examined a mummy of the Guanches, the aboriginal inhabitants of the Canary Islands, at the Roemer-Pelizaeus Museum in Hildesheim, Germany, Dec. 14, 2015.
Photo by Julian Stratenschulte/picture alliance via Getty Images
Queen Tiye, Tutankhamun’s grandmother, at the Egyptian museum in Cairo on February 17, 2010.
KHALED DESOUKI/AFP via Getty Images
Howard Carter, the noted English Egyptologist, near the golden sarcophagus of Tutankhamon in Egypt in 1922.
Photo by Apic/Getty Images
Chile’s Chinchorro mummies, the oldest in the world to have been purposefully preserved by humans, are on UNESCO’s World Heritage List. The mummies, which were found in the north of Chile at the start of the 20th century, are more than 7,000 years old, meaning they pre-date the Egyptian mummies by two millennia.
Photo by MARTIN BERNETTI/AFP via Getty Images
Lon Chaney Jr., dressed in character as Kharis the mummy, strangles the hapless Kurt Katch as Cajun Joe in a still from director Leslie Goodwins’s 1944 film ‘The Mummy’s Curse’.
Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images
A publicity poster from the film ‘The Mummy’, 1932.
If it’s not the strangest movie ever to come out of Hollywood, it’s close enough. And of all the strange movies to come out of Hollywood, it is likely the sweetest.
The stars of the 1948 film Bill and Coo were birds. That’s not to say these these birds stole the show by upstaging their human costars—the birds were the show. The movie’s running time is just over an hour, and except for a two-minute introduction featuring humans, the story is acted out entirely by trained birds on a set of miniatures.
The pictures on these pages from Republic’s new movie Bill and Coo are tokens of the gloomy contention of the producer, that movie stars belonging to the species homo sapiens are washed up and the birds are ready to take over….No newcomer to strange breeds of actors, Vaudevillian Ken Murray for the last five years has been packing Hollywood’s El Capital Theater with a raucous oldtime variety show called Blackouts…When a bird trainer named brought his lovebird act around, Murray was so impressed that he dreamed up a starring vehicle for it, had miniature sets built and a lovebird story written.
The entire movie can be viewed online, and the photos taken by Peter Stackpole capture both the charm and peculiarity of the enterprise. The film is set in “Chirpendale U.S.A.,” and the location is one of the movie’s many bird-themed puns. The story is narrated by an off-screen human, but you see birds doing things like walking in and out of buildings, pushing little baby carriages and dropping letters in mailboxes. The plot revolves Bill and Coo, who love each other despite their class differences (Bill has a taxi service, Coo comes from a wealthy family), and they must fight off a malicious crow who threatens life in Chirpendale.
(Perhaps the most surprising detail about the production is that it was the only movie directed by former child actor Dean Riesner, who decades later would leave his mark on Hollywood history as one of the writers of the decidedly un-precious movie Dirty Harry. Yes, the man who directed Bill and Coo also gave us the line “Do you feel lucky? Well, do you punk?“)
On the one hand, no one is going to mistake Bill and Coo for Citizen Kane. On the other hand, it did win an honorary Academy Award, for creating a film “In which artistry and patience blended in a novel and entertaining use of the medium of motion pictures.”
It was novel indeed. In fact, when you look at the movie’s IMDB page and scroll to the heading “More Like This,” what you get are not more live-action movies but rather animated films such as Bambi. Which is another way of saying, there really are no movies like this.
Bill and Coo, the titular stars of the movie, stood on top of a trolley on the film’s set.
Peter Stackpole/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Ken Murray first encountered the birds in his vaudeville show and helped dream up the idea for featuring them in the movie that become Bill and Coo.
Peter Stackpole/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Trainer George Burton works with alligators who also played a role in the movie Bill and Coo, 1947.
Peter Stackpole/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From the set of the bird-centric movie Bill and Coo, 1947.
Peter Stackpole/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The “wrong brothers” are celebrated in one of the many bird-related puns in the movie Bill and Coo.
Peter Stackpole/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A fire-bird slides down a pole the set of the all-bird movie Bill and Coo, 1947.
Peter Stackpole/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From the set of the bird-centric live action movie Bill and Coo, 1947.
Peter Stackpole/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From the set of the bird-centric movie Bill and Coo, 1947.
Peter Stackpole/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A crow played the villain in the bird-centric movie Bill and Coo, 1947.
Peter Stackpole/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Owls on the set of the bird-centric movie Bill and Coo, 1947.
Peter Stackpole/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
At the end of the movie Bill and Coo, the titular birds head off on their honeymoon in a puppy-drawn carriage, 1947.
Peter Stackpole/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Seriously, if you had to choose between only watching movies and shows that featured SNL alums or limiting yourself to movies and shows that had no one from Saturday Night Live in the cast—no Will Ferrell, Bill Murray, Adam Sandler, Eddie Murphy, Kate McKinnon, Mike Myers, Kristen Wiig, Bill Hader, Tina Fey, Amy Poehler, Martin Short, Robert Downey Jr. (yes, the future Iron Man was on SNL, though he lasted only one season) and on down the line— which would you choose? That this is even a viable discussion is a tribute to the magic that longtime producer Lorne Michaels has been able to conjure up from his casts.
Here we pay tribute to SNL with photos of the stars of its early years and the first few turnovers of a cast that is always evolving as it keeps people laughing.
Original SNL cast member John Belushi and with frequent guest host Steve Martin, 1981.
DMI/Shutterstock
Original SNL cast member John Belushi with frequent guest host Steve Martin, 1981.
DMI/Shutterstock
Bill Murray and Dan Aykroyd, circa 1985.
DMI/Shutterstock
Dan Aykroyd, 1988.
DMI/Shutterstock
Gilda Radner.
DMI/Shutterstock
Chevy Chase and SNL producer Lorne Michaels attending Saturday Night Live 25 party at NBC/Rainbow Room in 1999.
DMI Shutterstock
Cast members Eddie Murphy (left) and Joe Piscopo (right) appearing with guest Jerry Lewis on Saturday Night Live, 1984.
DMI/Shutterstock
Comedian Eddie Murphy (left) and singer Rick James following Murphy’s performance at Madison Square Garden, 1986.
David Mcgough/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Robert Downer Jr., 1989.
DMI/Shutterstock
Martin Short in his dressing room at Roundabout Theater, 1998.
Ted Thai/Shutterstock
Brad Hall, who was a Weekend Update anchor on Saturday Night Live, with wife and former SNL cast member Julia Louis-Dreyfus at the Golden Globe Awards, 1994.
DMI/Shutterstock
Jon Lovitz and Phil Hartman, 1987.
DMI/Shutterstock
Myers Mike and Dana Carvey/
DMI/Shutterstock
Molly Shannon and Cheri Oteri.
DMI/Shutterstock
Molly Shannon surrounded by women dressed as her Saturday Night Live character Mary Catherine Gallagher.
DMI
Victoria Jackson, 1989.
DMI/Shuttertstock
Kevin Nealon and Rob Schneider.
DMI/Shutterstock
Jan Hooks, 1991.
DMI/Shutterstock
Chris Farley, David Spade and Adam Sandler, 1990.
DMI
Chris Rock, David Spade and Chris Farley, 1994.
DMI/Shutterstock
Adam Sandler with Chris Rock, circa 1988.
DMI/Shutterstock
Chris Kattan and Will Ferrell, who played the Butabi brothers together on SNL and in the movie A Night at the Roxbury.