Jerrie Cobb Had the “Right Stuff,” But at the Wrong Time

There is one aspect of the space race that America lost decisively, and it had to do with gender. The first woman ever go into space was Russia’s Valentina Tereshkova, in 1963. America didn’t send its first woman to space until twenty years later when Sally Ride flew on the Space Shuttle Challenger in 1983.

But while America lagged, it was not because of a lack of qualified candidates.

In 1960 LIFE ran a story on pilot Jerrie Cobb headlined “A Lady Proves She’s Fit for Space Flight.” Cobb, 29, had just become the first woman to pass all the tests that America’s male astronauts had gone through as part of Project Mercury.

Cobb, from Oklahoma, had been taught to fly by her father and earned her first pilot’s license at age 16. She then set world records for speed, altitude and distance in the twin-engine class. Her accomplishments drew the attention of Dr. W. Randolph Lovelace II, who ran America’s astronaut training program. In 1959 Lovelace invited Cobb to try out.

Cobb withstood the gauntlet, demonstrating that she had what author Tom Wolfe would famously refer to as “the right stuff.” LIFE reported, “After a series of exhaustive and exhausting medical tests, 75 in all, during which she complained less than the Mercury men had, Jerrie Cobb easily passed the rigid requirements laid down for astronauts-in-training.”

LIFE staff photographer Ralph Crane documented Cobb going through her challenges. The magazine concluded, “It now appears inevitable that manned space flight will at some future date become co-educational.”

But that future date turned out to be more far off than expected.

In 1963 the frustration oozed from pages of LIFE when the magazine reported on Tereshkova’s history-making flight for Russia. By that time a dozen other American women had followed Cobb in passing the astronaut qualifying tests. LIFE’s story, headlined “The U.S. Team is Still Warming up the Bench,” fumed about the opportunity denied to these women, including Cobb, who was now what the magazine described as a “never-consulted consultant” to NASA administrator James Webb.

LIFE said, “Two years ago, when Russian space scientists visiting the U.S. first let on that they had a training program for female cosmonauts, Jerrie Cobb went to Washington, collaring anyone who would listen, pleading for a formal American woman-in-space program. The best she got was polite indifference.”

Today a NASA tribute page to Cobb explains why she never had the opportunity to go to space by saying “any hopes of becoming an official NASA astronaut were dashed when she, as a private citizen, was denied access to training facilities at a Navy base in Florida. At the time, all astronaut candidates were required to have military jet fighter experience, and the military did not allow female jet pilots.” The Air Force would not began to train female jet pilots until the mid-1970s.

So that was that. In 1999, after John Glenn flew a celebrated space mission at age 77, some pushed for Cobb to get the same chance, but she was again denied.

While Cobb never went to space, she demonstrated heroism in other—arguably more impactful—ways as she used her pilot’s skills to serve humanity. She moved to South America and spent 30 years delivering medical supplies to indigenous populations in hard-to-reach areas. The governments of Brazil, Ecuador, Paraguay, Colombia and France honored Cobb for her humanitarian work, and in 1981 she was nominated for the Nobel Prize.

Cobb died in 2019 at the age of 88.

In 1960 Jerrie Cobb became the first U.S. woman to qualify to become an astronaut, though she was never given an opportunity to go up into space.

Ralph Crane/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

In 1960 Jerrie Cobb became the first U.S. woman to qualify to become an astronaut, though she was never given an opportunity to go up into space.

Ralph Crane/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

Jerrie Cobb, who became a licensed pilot as a teenager and would later qualify to become an astronaut, flew a plane in her native Oklahoma, 1960.

Ralph Crane/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

Project Mercury’s Dr. W. Randolph Lovelace II questioned Jerrie Cobb as part of his process of determining if Cobb was capable of becoming an astronaut, 1960.

Ralph Crane/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

This pulminary test was one of the many hurdles that Jerrie Cobb passed in order to prove her fitness as an astronaut, 1960.

Ralph Crane/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

Jerrie Cobb in 1960 passed all the qualifying tests to become America’s first female astronaut but was never given the opportunity to go up into space.

Ralph Crane/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

Jerrie Cobb in 1960 passed all the qualifying tests to become America’s first female astronaut but was never given the opportunity to go up into space.

Ralph Crane/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

Jerrie Cobb in 1960 passed all the qualifying tests to become America’s first female astronaut but was never given the opportunity to go up into space.

Ralph Crane/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

Jerrie Cobb, a veteran pilot who qualified to become an astronaut in 1960, said she thought of the sky as “God’s unspoiled world which humans should not trespass upon without a feeling of reverance.”

Ralph Crane/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

Jerrie Cobb in 1960, after she became the first woman to pass the tests required to become an astronaut.

Ralph Crane/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

Jerrie Cobb in 1960 passed all the qualifying tests to become America’s first female astronaut but was never given the opportunity to go up into space.

Ralph Crane/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

A Wild Way to Move a House

In 1951 the people of Goose Rocks Beach wanted to move a meeting hall from nearly Kennebunkport up the coast to use as a community house. The question was, how to get the structure to its new location?

The innovative answer: float it on the ocean.

LIFE reported on this endeavor in a story headlined “House at Sea: A Maine Man Lets the Ocean Handle His Moving Job.”

The delightful article captured the local color as well as the details of the feat. Here’s how the story began:

A few words go a long way down on the coast of Maine, but by last week the lobstermen of Kennebunk Port were speaking whole sentences in wonder. Silently they had watched a good-sized house as it was towed out to sea, anchored overnight in the ocean and landed nine miles north at Goose Rocks Beach. Skeptically they had prophesied she’d founder (“there’ll be a lot of timber in the water before morning”). And worst of all, they had been shown their error by a freshwater man from Lewiston.

The man from Lewiston was named J.N. Jutras, who had come up with the plan, which he executed for a fee of $4,000 (or about $50,000 today). He floated pontoons on the beach at high tide, loaded the house onto the pontoons at low tide, and then floated the house off into the water.

One passenger rode in the house for its journey: Dorothy Mignault, who was president of the Goose Rocks Beach Association and a lead character of this book on Maine history. One lobsterman questioned her wisdom, telling LIFE, “You wouldn’t get me in that damned thing for all the dollars from here to Boston.”

The images by LIFE staff photographer Yale Joel show that the move became a community effort, with all hands on deck to bring the floating house to shore.

Not only did the Community House survive the trip, but all these years later it still serves visitors to Goose Beach. The structure, though, is in need of some help, which is why there is a $250,000 capital campaign to keep the Community House afloat, if you will.

The people of Goose Rock, Maine, helped bring ashore a house that was relocated over nine miles of water from Kennebunkport, 1951.

Yale Joel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

At the beginning of its relocation by water, a house was set upon pontoons in Kennebunkport, Maine, 1951.

Yale Joel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

Mover J. N. Jutras posed while waiting for high tide so he could bring the house to shore at Goose Rocks Beach in Maine, 1951.

Yale Joel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

This house was photographed while in the process of being relocated by water from Kennebunkport to Goose Rocks Beach in Maine, 1951.

Yale Joel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

Michael Jackson, in the Company of Stars

Michael Jackson appeared in LIFE when he was a mere 13 years old, but already famous as the lead singer of The Jackson Five. The photo, by John Olson, was part of a memorable cover story on musicians posing with their parents.

But soon after that photo ran, young Michael would branch out on his own, starting a solo career and transforming into the King of Pop. His 1982 record Thriller, featuring hits such as Billie Jean and Beat it, remains the best-selling album of all-time.

The biopic Michael, being released on April 24, 2026, traces Jackson’s rise to superstardom. What the movie does not deal with is the accusations of child molestation that came out against Jackson in the 1990s and shadowed him until his death in 2009.

The photos in this gallery are mostly from the 1980s and early 1990s, and come from Michael Jackson’s public appearances. While obviously giving a surface portrait, the pictures do demonstrate just how big a deal Michael Jackson was at the peak of his fame. Everyone wanted to be in his company.

The wide range of famous people he was photographed with includes Eddie Murphy, Elizabeth Taylor, Diana Ross, Whitney Houston, Sophia Loren, Lionel Richie, Liza Minelli, Cher, Brooke Shields, and more. The most random pairing shows the King of Pop with The King and I star Yul Brenner. One photo of Michael Jackson with fellow pop icon Madonna remains among the top sellers in the LIFE photo store.

On more than one occasion Jackson was also photographed future president Donald Trump. The two were close enough that when Jackson died at age 50 due to acute propofol intoxication, Trump offered a remembrance of Jackson to TIME magazine. Trump praised the pop star’s talent, genius and overwhelming popularity while acknowledging Jackson’s troubled state in his later years. Trump predicted to TIME, “He’s not going to be remembered for the last 10 years; he’s going to be remembered for the first 35 years.”

Members of pop group Jackson Five (clockwise L-R): Jackie, parents Joe and Katherine, Marlon, Tito, Jermaine and Michael in their backyard.

The Jackson Five and their parents in 1970: (clockwise L-R): Jackie, parents Joe and Katherine, Marlon, Tito, Jermaine and Michael in their backyard.

John Olson /The LIFE Picture Collection © Meredith Corporation

Michael Jackson and Diana Ross.

DMI

Michael Jackson and Elizabeth Taylor.

DMI

Michael Jackson and Liza Minnelli, 1981.

DMI

Michael Jackson and Olivia Newton-John, 1983.

DMI

Michael Jackson with Brooke Shields.

DMI

Michael Jackson with Cher.

DMI

Michael Jackson and Yul Brenner.

DMI

Michael Jackson and Lionel Richie, 1986.

DMI

Michael Jackson and Whitney Houston, 1988.

DMI

Singer Michael Jackson and actor Eddie Murphy in Press Room at American Music Awards, 1989.

Kevin Winter/DMI

Michael Jackson and Sophia Loren.

DMI

Michael Jackson with his sister Janet.

DMI

Madonna and Michael Jackson (left) arrived at the Shrine Civic Auditorium for the 63rd Annual Academy Awards ceremony, March 25, 1991.

DMI

Michael Jackson and Donald Trump.

DMI

Michael Jackson and Donald Trump.

DMI

Michael Jackson , Marla Maples and Donald Trump, 1992.

DMI

Michael Jackson in concert.

DMI

Michael Jackson in concert.

DMI

In 1950, Red Was the New Black

When it comes to clothing, red is not just another color. It is worn by monarchs and devils, and in general by people comfortable with having all eyes on them. A history of the red dress in Europe’s NSS magazine noted that “there are animals that have evolved to make their skin or their plumage red in the mating season, some flowers are red to attract the largest number of bees and birds – and even among humans red is the color of passion and danger.”

In its Feb. 27, 1950 issue LIFE ran a story headlined “The Little Red Dress” which declared that the color was having a moment, and that the red dress “may prove the ’50s first fashion classic.” The lead image of the story, taken by LIFE staff photographer Gjon Mili, showed models high-stepping to The Charleston, a 1920s dance craze that was again having a moment.

The brief story acknowledged the primacy of the little black dress even while talking about red becoming a popular alternative, and going on to explain in frank terms what it takes to pull off the new look:

The turn of the half-century has been brightened by a rash of short red evening dresses. “The little red dress” may be lace, crepe or chiffon, costs from $25 to $450. Designers feel it may take its place beside the “good little black” dress as a similar, if more specialized, fashion classic. The inconspicuous black dress covered a multitude of figure problems, was worn like a uniform with standard accessories (pearls, oyster pumps, white gloves). The red dress, definitely conspicuous, is developing its own requirements. The wearer must have a good figure, a sleek hairdo, matching shoes, and the dress itself must have simple lines to allow a solid concentration of color. This is set off my an emphatic splash of rhinestones.

While black remains king, red has certainly made its mark, including in the early 1950s. A ranking of classic red dresses throughout history had at the top of its list those worn by Marilyn Monroe and Jane Russell in the 1953 movie Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. LIFE actually had a photographer, Ed Clark, on the set of that movie. Alas, unlike Mili, Clark was shooting his photos of those red dresses in black and white.

in 1950 newly fashionable red dresses were modeled by women doing what LIFE called “the newly revivded Charleston.”

Gjon Mili/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

In a 1950 fashion shoot about the red dress, this model accentuated her look with red rhinestone-trimmed pumps.

Gjon Mili/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

This model accessorized her red dress with a red boa and rhinestone jewelry, 1950.

Gjon Mili/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

Route 66: An Invitation To Roam, and To Dream

The celebrated Route 66 turns 100 in 2026. It’s a milestone worth noting because the fabled highway captured the spirit of the age when car culture came to America.

Ever since Henry Ford began mass-producing his revolutionary Model T and made car ownership accessible to the middle class, Americans have been engaged in a love affair with automobiles and, in a much larger sense, with the enduring myth of the open road. Has there ever been a culture that extolled movement for the sake of movement as fervently as 20th century America?

And Route 66 was the epitome of that. The highway was referred to as the “Mother Road‘ by novelist John Steinbeck in The Grapes of Wrath. An oft-covered song by Bobby Troup identified Route 66 as the place to get your kicks. In American culture the road that ran from Chicago through Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and finally to Los Angeles was much more than a way to get from point A to point B. 

In 1947, Andreas Feininger made a photograph that might be the single most perfect picture ever made of Route 66. It is beautiful, of course, but it is also a remarkable distillation of an idea: namely, that the American West is a place where people find themselves, or lose themselves, amid heat, sun, open spaces, enormous skies.

(Note that the version of the photo at the top of this story was cropped to fit the page template, but below you can appreciate the image in its uncropped, open-sky glory.)

Feininger’s photograph, taken in Seligman, Arizona,  is packed with “information”—cars, a bus, human figures, a gas station, a garage, towering clouds, an arrow-straight ribbon of road to the horizon—but it’s the emptiness of the space that is most attractive. It can be read as a metaphor for the blank slate that innumerable people have sought in the West. Here is where you can redefine yourself, the scene suggests. Reimagine yourself. Reinvent yourself. Then keep moving. 

Like the American West itself or like the mythical West of our collective dreams, Feininger’s Route 66 feels both companionable and limitless. 

Ben Cosgrove is the Editor of LIFE.com

Cumulus clouds billow above a stretch of Route 66 in Arizona, 1947.

Route 66, here shown in Seligman, Arizona in 1947, took on a special romance for those who yearned to strike out for adventure.

Andreas Feininger The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock

The Politics of Butter vs. Margarine

Margarine became a source of political controversy in the U.S. soon after its arrival in the 1870s. The spread had been invented in France in 1869 by a chemist who had been encouraged by the Emperor Louis Napoleon III to create a cheap alternative to butter, but American dairy farmers did not welcome the competition. As documented in thishistory of butter vs. margarine in National Geographic, “In 1886, passionate lobbying from the dairy industry led to the federal Margarine Act, which slapped a restrictive tax on margarine and demanded that margarine manufacturers pay prohibitive licensing fees. Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Ohio went a step further and banned margarine outright.”

And that was not all. Thirty-two states barred margarine makers from dyeing their product yellow (its natural color is white)—with Vermont, New Hampshire and South Dakota adding the extra requirement that margarine must be dyed pink. (The U.S. Supreme Court eventually overturned the mandatory dyeing).

But despite political opposition margarine persisted and grew in popularity during the Depression because of its price. By that time margarine manufacturers were using an updated formula which relied on vegetable oils rather than animal fats, as it had originally.

But the butter industry continued to flex its political muscle. A story in the May 29, 1948 issue of LIFE headlined “The Butter Lobby Wins” recounted its latest victory—and also the rising opposition.

Spearheading margarine’s counteroffensive was Edward Mitchell, a U.S. congressman from Indiana who had been a margarine dealer before entering politics. Mitchell posed for LIFE staff photographer Francis Miller in front of a phalanx of pro-margarine congressman, and was also shown hosting a margarine party in which he donned a chef’s hat and served up samples.

Another of Miller’s photos shows an anti-butter display from the margarine lobby which proclaimed “No food has a corner on any color.”

While the butter lobby won the day in 1948, two years later Congress turned around and repealed the margarine tax. And in 1967 Wisconsin, a dairy capital, became the last state to rescind its ban on coloring margarine yellow.

By then butter makers’ worst fears were coming true. In the 1960s margarine overtook butter as America’s spread of choice, and it built a commanding lead through the 1970s, ’80s and ’90s. But butter mounted a comeback and overtook margarine in the mid-2000s. With the taxes gone, the battlegrounds in this war became taste and health.

When it comes to health, the consensus seems to be that margarine is better for you because it is fats are mostly unsaturated—and that is especially true when the margarine is the softer variety that is sold in tubs. But butter generally wins when it comes to taste, and it is also perceived as being more natural.

So today the butter vs. margarine debate is really about the choice between what is better for you and what you enjoy more.

If Congress wants to try legislating that, good luck.

U.S. Representative Edward Archibald Mitchell (foreground) led the pro-margarine forces in Congress as they attempted to repeal a tax against butter’s chief competitor, 1948.

Francis Miller/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

U.S. Representative Edward Archibald Mitchell, in a chef’s hat, held a party for the pro-margarine forces in Congress, 1948.

Francis Miller/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

U.S. Representative Edward Archibald Mitchell, in a chef’s hat, held a party for the pro-margarine forces in Congress, 1948.

Francis Miller/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

U.S. Representative Edward Archibald Mitchell, in a chef’s hat, held a party for the pro-margarine forces in Congress, 1948.

Francis Miller/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

U.S. Representative Edward Archibald Mitchell, in a chef’s hat, held a party for the pro-margarine forces in Congress, 1948.

Francis Miller/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

From a 1948 story on the fight over butter vs. margarine in Congress.

Francis Miller/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

For years many states prohibited margarine makers from coloring their product yellow, a restriction margarine makers fought against,1948.

Francis Miller/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock

More Like This

lifestyle

Rest for the Weary: Images of Sleep

lifestyle

When Bowling Was Women’s “Greatest Social Center Since the Back Fence”

lifestyle

The Making of Times Square’s “Anatomical Artistic Atrocity”

Beach scene at Lima, Peru, 1959 lifestyle

LIFE’s Favorite Vintage Surfing Photos

lifestyle

From the Factory to the Track: Inside the Fantastic World of Ferrari Racing

lifestyle

Shoes That Really Match the Outfit